Walter Smith Fine Foods completed a five-year restructuring arc ending in a CVA

Birmingham meat processor Walter Smith Fine Foods entered a Schedule A1 moratorium in November 2019 and completed a CVA in January 2025, keeping the business alive.

Information for general guidance, drawn from the public record. Not legal, financial, or insolvency advice. If you are affected by an insolvency, consult a licensed practitioner or qualified solicitor.

Street View image of Federation House, B33 0UB, Birmingham, the registered office
Street View image of the registered office. © Google.

Walter Smith Fine Foods Limited entered a Schedule A1 moratorium on 25 November 2019. At that point, HSBC Bank PLC and Bell Finance Ltd both held outstanding fixed and floating charges over all the company's assets.

A Schedule A1 moratorium is a breathing space available to eligible companies under the Insolvency Act 1986. Directors remain in control while a supervisor oversees a short pause in creditor action. It is a precursor to a rescue plan, not an insolvency appointment in itself. The moratorium was filed pursuant to Paragraph 10(1) of Schedule A1 to the Insolvency Act 1986, and the Gazette notice was published on 27 November 2019.

The company

Walter Smith Fine Foods is a Birmingham-based meat processor and wholesaler, operating from Federation House, 383 Garretts Green Lane, Birmingham, B33 0UB. Its registered SIC activities cover the production of meat and poultry meat products, wholesale of meat and meat products, and retail sale of meat and meat products. The company was incorporated in August 2009, initially under the name GG130 Limited, and adopted its current trading name from 1 September 2009.

The directors

The directors at the time of the moratorium were Mark Edward Burnhope, Robert David Jones and Paul Richard Cadman, all appointed from incorporation in August 2009. Cadman also served as company secretary. He subsequently resigned from both roles on 1 December 2025. Anthony Charles Yorath had resigned as a director in October 2018, before the moratorium was filed.

The charges

HSBC Bank PLC holds a fixed and floating charge over all assets, created on 14 August 2017 and delivered to Companies House the following day. A fixed charge attaches to a specific identified asset; a floating charge covers assets that change over time, such as stock and debtors, and crystallises on insolvency. Bell Finance Limited holds two registered charges, both created on 28 April 2017 and delivered on 4 May 2017. All three charges remain outstanding on the register.

From moratorium to CVA

Timothy Frank Corfield was appointed as supervisor. The company then pursued a company voluntary arrangement, a formal agreement between a company and its creditors to repay debts over time while the business continues to trade. That CVA was completed on 17 January 2025, closing a restructuring process that had run for more than five years. Walter Smith Fine Foods is now recorded as active at Companies House and is operating under new management.

A moratorium-to-completed-CVA arc of five years is relatively uncommon. Most CVAs run for three to five years, and successful completion means the company has met its obligations to creditors under the arrangement's terms.

For creditors and suppliers

Now that the CVA has been completed, the arrangement's terms will have governed how creditor claims were handled throughout the process. Under a CVA, a supervisor issues communications to known creditors and manages distributions in line with the agreed proposal. Creditors who were party to the arrangement will have received their entitlements as set out in the CVA terms.

A proof of debt is the formal claim form a creditor submits to evidence the amount owed. Creditors who did not formally submit claims during the CVA process should take independent advice on whether any residual rights remain.

During the moratorium period, the legal pause under Schedule B1, Paragraph 43 of the Insolvency Act 1986 meant most creditor enforcement action was suspended without leave of the court. That protection applied from the moratorium's coming into force in November 2019.

Trade suppliers and customers with unpaid claims ranked as unsecured creditors in the arrangement hierarchy, behind secured lenders such as HSBC and Bell Finance. Employee wages, notice pay and redundancy claims are handled separately in insolvency-adjacent processes, with the Redundancy Payments Service able to meet certain statutory entitlements where an employer cannot.

Common questions

Are you owed money by Walter Smith Fine Foods Limited?

You are an unsecured creditor unless you hold a registered charge or retention of title. The administrators will write to known creditors in due course with a proof-of-debt form and timetable for the first meeting. Until that letter arrives, no formal action is required from you. Read more about proof of debt and where you sit in the creditor hierarchy.

Did you work at Walter Smith Fine Foods Limited?

Wages owed up to a statutory cap, holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy may be claimable from the Redundancy Payments Service if the company is unable to pay. The administrators will normally coordinate the RP1 claim with the affected staff. See gov.uk: your rights if your employer is insolvent.

Do you hold a deposit, gift card or undelivered order from Walter Smith Fine Foods Limited?

Customers with paid-but-undelivered orders, gift cards or deposits typically rank as unsecured creditors. Where you paid by credit card and the amount was over £100, Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 may let you claim from the card issuer for breach of contract or misrepresentation by the supplier; the rules apply per item, not per transaction, and the card must be a regulated credit card. Debit-card payments may be recoverable via chargeback.

Are you a director of a company connected to Walter Smith Fine Foods Limited?

Watch for Section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986 if you intend to keep trading under a similar name in a successor company. The rule prohibits a director of a liquidated company from being involved in another company using the same or a similar name for five years, unless one of the statutory exceptions applies. Read more about Section 216.

Sources

Last reviewed by James Waterton on .

AI-drafted (Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6) from The London Gazette and Companies House records, then human-reviewed by James Waterton before publication. See our methodology and editorial standards.

Sourced from official UK records under the Open Government Licence. Information for general guidance, not legal advice.